| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | [2011] NZERA Christchurch 124 |
| Determination date | 22 August 2011 |
| Member | J Crichton |
| Representation | K Boniface (in person) ; P Wicks |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Boniface (Labour Inspector) v Credence Development Ltd t/a Japanese Tourist Centre |
| Summary | PENALTY – Authority reserved leave for applicant to make application for imposition of penalties if respondent failed to meet obligations in terms of substantive determination – Applicant claimed no payment had been received from respondent and as result sought penalties – Respondent claimed penalties should not be imposed as failed to meet obligations due to poor financial position and imposition of penalties would make it more likely that obligations could not be honoured – Authority found appropriate for respondent to have further three months to meet obligations – Found if obligations not satisfied after three months then unlikely Authority would be discouraged from imposing penalties – Leave reserved for applicant to seek penalties |
| Result | Application dismissed |
| Main Category | Penalty |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | 2011_NZERA_Christchurch_124.pdf [pdf 11 KB] |