| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | AA 253/02 |
| Hearing date | 7 Aug 2002 |
| Determination date | 26 August 2002 |
| Member | D King |
| Representation | MJ Robinson ; P Tremewan |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Dykman v Sensation Yachts Ltd |
| Summary | UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Redundancy - Applicant agreed to move to new work premises - Dismissed after refusal to sign new employment contract with new company named as employer - Contract provided that applicant could no longer work some hours from home - Told that old position redundant - No discussion prior to move that position redundant - Move to new site did not amount to new position - Dismissed due to inability to work full time on site - Clearly an attempt to impose unilateral variation - No genuine redundancy - Dismissal unjustified |
| Result | Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($12,500) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($6,000) ; Reimbursement of lost benefits ($974.22) ; Costs reserved |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |