Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2011] NZERA Auckland 460
Determination date 25 October 2011
Member A Dumbleton
Location Auckland
Parties Mayne and Ors v Polychem Marketing Ltd
Summary COSTS – Unsuccessful jurisdiction claims – One and a half day investigation meeting – Parties disputed whether had reached agreement to settle costs – Applicants claimed respondent had offered and applicants had accepted $5,000 was reasonable contribution towards respondent’s costs – Respondent claimed applicants did not accept offer in time and offer had lapsed – Authority found offer expired before accepted by applicants and matter to be determined by Authority – Respondent only sought costs from first applicant (“M”) – Respondent sought contribution from M towards costs at level significantly higher than daily tariff as claimed applicants failed to correctly identify employer – Respondent made applicants Calderbank offer – Found matter of substantial factual and legal complexity therefore reasonable preparation time could be allowed for in costs award – M claimed costs should be no more than $5,000 – Found applicants’ conduct unnecessarily increased respondent’s costs and applicants’ claim fatally flawed – Found respondent offered not to seek costs against second and third applicants if claim withdrawn and if M’s claim withdrawn offered to accept agreed costs – Found applicant rejected opportunity to settle costs at very reasonable amount given outcome – Found $14,000 award appropriate to cover respondent’s considerable preparation – M to pay respondent $14,000 contribution towards costs
Result Costs in favour of respondent ($14,000)
Main Category Costs
Statutes ERA s4;ERA Second Schedule cl15
Cases Cited Mayne & Ors v Polychem Marketing Ltd [2011] NZERA Auckland 360;PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808
Number of Pages 5
PDF File Link: 2011_NZERA_Auckland_460.pdf [pdf 21 KB]