Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2011] NZERA Auckland 469
Hearing date 1 Jul 2011
Determination date 28 October 2011
Member D King
Representation S Austin ; L Jones, M Beech
Location Auckland
Parties Tomo v Checkmate Precisions Cutting Tools Ltd
Summary PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Whether accord and satisfaction – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Respondent claimed binding agreement reached to settle matter – Applicant invited to attend meeting to discuss proposal to disestablish applicant’s position – No signed copy of employment agreement – Applicant claimed had become union member and collective agreement applied – Applicant suggested redeployment under the adult apprenticeship scheme or alternatively severance package of voluntary resignation with payment of holiday pay, six weeks’ notice paid in lieu and $8,000 compensation – Respondent claimed no basis for payment – Applicant resigned from union and signed resignation letter – Respondent claimed rejected settlement proposal – Respondent claimed agreed with applicant that applicant would be made redundant and would work out six week notice period – Respondent sent applicant letter which set out agreement – Applicant disputed agreement reached – Authority found agreement reached on process for implementation of applicant’s redundancy – Found neither letter nor meeting notes referred to personal grievance – Found no mention of full and final settlement – Found no consideration – Found no meeting of minds regarding anything other than how redundancy would be implemented – Found no accord and satisfaction – Found applicant not estopped from pursuing personal grievance – Driver
Result Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
Main Category Practice & Procedure
Statutes ERA s61(2)(a)
Cases Cited Graham v Crestline Pty Ltd [2006] ERNZ 848
Number of Pages 6
PDF File Link: 2011_NZERA_Auckland_469.pdf [pdf 21 KB]