| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2011] NZERA Auckland 474 |
| Determination date | 02 November 2011 |
| Member | A Dumbleton |
| Representation | S Shaikh ; L Sharma (in person) |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Monopoliz Supplies Ltd v Sharma |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application to reopen investigation – Applicant claimed respondent’s statements fabricated and requested second opportunity to present “witnesses and proof” – Applicant failed to comply with Authority’s previous directions that applicant provide affidavits regarding “witnesses and proof” and explanation whether evidence could have been obtained for first investigation meeting – Applicant requested extension of time to provide evidence – Respondent claimed applicant further delaying resolution of matter – Authority found had already made allowances for applicant including hearing from applicant although applicant failed to provide statement in reply or supporting evidence – Found respondent’s claim that applicant merely trying to avoid enforcement of previous Authority determination reasonable – Application for extension of time declined - Application to reopen declined |
| Result | Application dismissed ; No order for costs |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Statutes | ERA Second Schedule cl4 |
| Cases Cited | Sharma v Monopoliz Supplies Ltd [2011] NZERA Auckland 339 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | 2011_NZERA_Auckland_474.pdf [pdf 19 KB] |