Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2011] NZERA Auckland 512
Hearing date 30 Nov 2011
Determination date 01 December 2011
Member R A Monaghan
Representation K Kay (in person) ; M Kirkman
Location Auckland
Parties Kay v Maori Boy Glass Ltd
Summary COMPLIANCE ORDER – Applicant sought compliance with settlement agreement – Applicant claimed payments withheld – Applicant claimed prospective employer unable to speak with respondent director (“K”) regarding reference – K claimed numerous efforts made to contact prospective employer – Applicant sought order that K discontinue making product sold in side business and receive half share of any profit from sales made after date of settlement – Authority found K not entitled to withhold payments under settlement – Found K’s explanation as to reference satisfactory – Found fact K continued dealing with product in question did not amount to breach of settlement – Found no breach of settlement provided any subsequent business activity separate from activities of side business – COUNTERCLAIM – Respondent claimed settlement should be set aside, parties returned to positions prior to entry into settlement and original dispute heard in Employment Court – Respondent claimed applicant failed to return stock – Applicant claimed withheld items because K had withheld payments required under settlement – Found applicant in breach of settlement – Respondent claimed applicant had not returned all stock – Found counterclaim could not proceed due to terms of settlement and s149 Employment Relations Act 2000 – PENALTY – Applicant sought penalty for non-compliance – Found inappropriate to impose penalty
Result Application granted (compliance order) ; Compliance ordered ; Application dismissed (counterclaim) (penalty) ; No order for costs ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee)
Main Category Compliance Order
Statutes ERA s136(2);ERA s149;ERA s149(4)
Number of Pages 6
PDF File Link: 2011_NZERA_Auckland_512.pdf [pdf 25 KB]