• Masoe v Te Roopu Awhina Ki Porirua Trust

    P R Stapp [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]

    Summary:
    ARREARS OF WAGES – Applicant sought $1,548 unpaid sick leave – Respondent claimed applicant not entitled to sick leave because all sick leave entitlement used – Authority found leave records…
    Result:
    Application granted ; Arrears of wages ($1,548.20) ; Damages for costs ($3,656) ; Costs reserved
  • Specialised Washers & Gaskets (2005) Ltd v Bron

    G J Wood [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]

    Summary:
    CONSENT ORDER – Parties reached agreement on terms of settlement at investigation meeting – Applicant claimed respondent breached employment agreement through dissemination of confidential information and competing with and soliciting…
    Result:
    Consent order granted ; Orders accordingly ; No order for costs
  • New Zealand Meat Workers Union v Affco New Zealand Ltd

    G J Wood [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]

    Summary:
    DISPUTE – INJUNCTION – Following comments made and actions taken by applicant’s organiser (“M”), respondent (Affco NZ Ltd – Employer) informed applicant (NZ Meat Worker’s Union – Union) would not…
    Result:
    Application granted ; Orders accordingly
  • Kyle v HA & FM Brittenden Partnership

    J Crichton [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]

    Summary:
    UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Constructive dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Argument occurred between applicant and one of respondent’s owners (“B”) – Applicant objected to disrespectful way another…
    Result:
    Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
  • Wolak v Cityline NZ Ltd t/a The Valley Flyer Ltd

    P R Stapp [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]

    Summary:
    UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious misconduct – Applicant dismissed by respondent for using highly offensive language that was not acceptable in workplace – Applicant denied allegation regarding words attributed to her…
    Result:
    Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
  • Nash v Business Capability New Zealand Society Inc

    P R Stapp [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]

    Summary:
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Identity of employer – Respondent claimed never employed applicant at any time – Applicant claimed respondent assumed responsibility over employment – Applicant advised position to be…
    Result:
    Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
  • Hutchinson v La Bella Italia Distributors Ltd

    G J Wood [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]

    Summary:
    UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Constructive dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably constructively dismissed – Claimed bullied and harassed by manager (“M”) resulting in unjustified disadvantage – Also claimed respondent…
    Result:
    Applications dismissed (Dismissal)(Disadvantage) ; Application granted (Recovery of monies) ; Recovery of monies ($589.08) ; Costs reserved
  • Muldoon v Nelson Marlborough District Health Board

    M B Loftus [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]

    Summary:
    UNJSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed – Respondent argued applicant could not have been dismissed given casual employee status – Applicant claimed became permanent full time employee during employment…
    Result:
    Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
  • Riley & Anor v Blueprint Ltd

    J Crichton [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]

    Summary:
    UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious misconduct – Applicants confidential union members as concerned would be discriminated against on grounds of union membership if respondent knew - Respondent signalled intention to commence…
    Result:
    Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
  • Tuck v Anglican Care (Waiapu) Ltd

    R A Monaghan [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    COSTS – Unsuccessful personal grievance – Two day investigation meeting – Respondent sought $7,500 contribution to costs for interim reinstatement application and $7,500 for substantive matter – Respondent made two…
    Result:
    Costs in favour of respondent ($14,000)
    • 28 January 2011

    • [2011] NZERA Auckland 40