• Brinkman v Versatile Buildings Ltd

    L Robinson [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    COSTS - Partially unsuccessful personal grievance - Two day investigation meeting - Respondent's actual costs were $30,903 - Sought contribution of $19,216 being principally costs incurred after Calderbank offer rejected…
    Result:
    Costs in favour of respondent ($5,000)
  • Moore v PG 2000 Ltd

    D Asher [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]

    Summary:
    JURISDICITON - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Whether applicant’s claim statute barred by s317 Injury Prevention, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2001 (IPR&C Act) - Applicant alleged exposed to tungsten and cobalt…
    Result:
    Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
  • Wills v Air New Zealand Ltd

    P Montgomery [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]

    Summary:
    UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious misconduct – Summary dismissal – Respondent audited employees’ internet use – Resulted in applicant’s dismissal for excessive personal use – Authority found internet use policies disbursed…
    Result:
    Application granted ; Reinstatement ordered ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($8,048) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($5,000) ; Leave reserved to return to Authority ; Costs reserved
  • Snow & 29 Ors v Fonterra Co-Operative Group Ltd

    H Doyle [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]

    Summary:
    DISPUTE - Applicants sought determination that superannuation provision in collective employment agreement (CEA") had retrospective effect - Respondent claimed it agreed to applicants becoming eligible for superannuation benefit but eligibility…
    Result:
    Question answered in favour of respondent ; Costs reserved
  • Schouten v New Zealand Ruby Rock Ltd

    H Doyle [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]

    Summary:
    UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Misconduct - Applicant dismissed for alleged dishonesty in money matters - Respondent claimed applicant increased her hourly rate without permission - Respondent confronted applicant and required her…
    Result:
    Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($6,760) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($10,000) ; Holiday pay ($663.12) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($70)(Filing fee)
  • Shakes & Anor v Norske Skog Tasman Ltd

    J Scott [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – Applicants union delegates at respondent – Respondent approved paid union leave under collective employment agreement (CEA") for applicants to attend investigation meeting of employee from different union…
    Result:
    Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
  • Kapua v Te Hauora O Te Hiku O Te Ika Trust & Anor

    R A Monaghan [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application to strike out party – Applicant brought personal grievance against both respondents – Respondents claimed first respondent employer – Applicant and first respondent parties to…
    Result:
    Application granted ; Orders accordingly ; Costs reserved
  • Pantoja v GN Networks Ltd

    J Wilson [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    JURISDICTION – Whether employee – Respondent claimed never employed applicant – Alleged offer of employment made on behalf of proposed new joint-venture company – Respondent claimed decided not to continue…
    Result:
    Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
  • Postal Workers Association v New Zealand Post Ltd

    R Arthur [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    DISPUTE - Interpretation of provision regarding allowance for posties who used own vehicles get to start point or other parts of round - Bicycles used for deliveries - Vehicle user…
    Result:
    Question answered in favour of respondent ; Costs reserved
  • Andrews v Men at Work Building Solutions Ltd

    R Arthur [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - Redundancy - Applicant claimed redundancy not genuine, not properly consulted, and not offered part-time replacement position - Undisputed that new technology greatly reduced applicant’s…
    Result:
    Application granted ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($1,500) ; Costs reserved