-
Ray v Okeby & Anor
G J Wood [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Summary dismissal - No appearance for respondent – Applicant’s evidence accepted in full - Applicant employed by second respondent – No written employment agreement – Incident occurred…
- Result:
- Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($6,127.45)(6 weeks) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($5,000) ; Arrears of holiday pay ($628.71) ; Costs in favour of applicant ($1,800) ; Disbursements ($150)
-
Paterson v Max G Ltd t/a New World Remuera
R A Monaghan [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Redundancy – Applicant’s personal relationship with respondent’s director and shareholder ended – Alleged made redundant because pursuing legal remedies under Property (Relationships) Act 1976 – Genuine redundancy…
- Result:
- Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($3,040)(4 weeks) ; Compensation for lost benefit (Grocery allowance)($2,000) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($4,000) ; Costs reserved
-
Holt & Anor v Toll NZ Consolidated Ltd
P Cheyne [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- DISPUTE – Interpretation of Holidays Act 2003 – Applicant’s request to take alternative holiday on specified weekend day denied – Respondent insisted applicant use annual leave – Whether respondent could…
- Result:
- Question answered in favour of applicant (Interpretation of Holidays Act 2003) ; Question answered in favour of respondent (Interpretation of collective agreement) ; Application dismissed (Penalty) ; Costs reserved
-
Solomon v Kirikiriroa Family Service Trust
J Crichton [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- CONSENT ORDER - Parties reached agreement on terms of settlement - Terms of settlement to be orders of Authority - Order prohibiting publication of terms of settlement
- Result:
- Consent order granted ; Orders accordingly ; No order for costs
-
Reid v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd
Y S Oldfield [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious misconduct - Applicant Branch Secretary for union – Advised employees arriving for morning shift there would be meeting of delegates and shift would start 30 minutes…
- Result:
- Application granted ; Reinstatement ordered ; Reimbursement of lost wages (Four weeks) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($2,500) ; Costs reserved
-
Karaitiana v Emerson
G J Wood [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- COMPLIANCE ORDER - Applicant sought compliance with mediated settlement - No appearance by respondent - Applicant had not received sums owed under agreement - Settlement agreement contained term that made…
- Result:
- Application granted ; Compliance ordered ; Orders accordingly ; Costs reserved
-
Lane v Trust House Ltd
D Asher [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- CONSENT ORDER - Parties reached agreement on terms of settlement - Terms of settlement to be orders of Authority - Terms of settlement full, final and binding - Order prohibiting…
- Result:
- Consent order granted ; Orders accordingly ; No order for costs
-
Nikora v Trust House Ltd
D Asher [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- CONSENT ORDER - Parties reached agreement on terms of settlement - Terms of settlement to be orders of Authority - Order prohibiting publication of terms of settlement
- Result:
- Consent order granted ; Orders accordingly ; No order for costs
-
Edmonds v Glenlg Rest Home Ltd
P Cheyne [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – No appearance for respondent – Applicant made arrangements for another employee to work night shift for her – Respondent alleged applicant was instructed not to do…
- Result:
- Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($300) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($6,000) ; Costs in favour of applicant ($500)
-
Fletcher v Chief Executive, Statistics New Zealand
J Wilson [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by respondent not properly recognising role as union delegate when carried out salary and performance review, and when decided eligibility for key…
- Result:
- Application dismissed ; Costs reserved