• Wilton v Stepping Stones Nursery Ltd

    G J Wood;G J Wood [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]

    Summary:
    CONSENT ORDER - At investigation meeting parties advised they had successfully resolved all matters between themselves - Terms of settlement to be orders of Authority - Order prohibiting publication of…
    Result:
    Consent order granted ; Orders accordingly ; No order for costs
  • Haywood v Blackwell Motors Ltd

    H Doyle [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]

    Summary:
    UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - Applicant's position as car sales manager disestablished - Worked as car salesman until resignation - Whether decision to disestablish was for genuine commercial reasons…
    Result:
    Application dismissed ; Orders accordingly ; Costs reserved
  • Lindsay v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd t/a CHH Futurebuild

    R A Monaghan [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    COSTS - Unsuccessful personal grievance - Two day investigation meeting - Respondent sought contribution of $20,000 to actual costs of $37,636 plus disbursements and witness expenses - Applicant submitted costs…
    Result:
    Costs in favour of respondent ($8,000) ; Disbursements ($650.50) ; Witness expenses (airfares, travel costs, accommodation)($2,410.79)
  • Ah Chee v Panda Catering Ltd

    M Urlich [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Redundancy - Applicant dismissed for redundancy after applicant's brothers sold shares in respondent - Process used by respondent to implement redundancy fell well below accepted standard -…
    Result:
    Application granted ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($12,000) ; Cost reserved
  • Sinclair v Local Media Group Ltd

    R A Monaghan [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    COSTS - Authority determined applicant not an employee - Length of investigation meeting not specified - Respondent sought contribution of $3,000 to actual costs of $19,167 - No response from…
    Result:
    Costs in favour of respondent ($3,000)
  • Epic Packaging Ltd v New Zealand Amalgamated Engineering, Printing & Manufacturing Union Inc

    Y S Oldfield [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    BARGAINING - Parties disagreed about whether respondent could initiate bargaining (in terms of s42 Employment Relations Act 2000) in relation to possible joinder of applicant as subsequent party to multi…
    Result:
    Question answered in favour of respondent ; Costs reserved
  • Matich v Christian Healthcare Trust

    A Dumbleton [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Serious misconduct - Respondent determined applicant had failed to provide assistance when requested by resident for another resident (first incident"), and failed to assist another resident when…
    Result:
    Application granted ; Reinstatement ordered ; Reimbursement of lost wages (quantum to be determined by parties)(contributory conduct 50%) ; Interest (8.5%) ; Compensation for humiliation (close to $10,000 reduced to $4,000) ; Costs reserved
  • Russell (Labour Inspector) v Hemara t/a Bass Cleaning

    P R Stapp [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]

    Summary:
    COMPLIANCE ORDER - Applicant Labour Inspector sought compliance order in respect of demand notice - Demand notice required respondent to pay employee W" holiday pay of $1,572 - Respondent challenged…
    Result:
    Application granted ; Compliance order made ; No order for costs
  • Faletolu v Tofilau Finance Ltd

    P R Stapp [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]

    Summary:
    CONSENT ORDER - Application for recovery of wages and holiday pay - By consent respondent ordered to pay specified sum to applicant - No issue on costs
    Result:
    Consent order granted ; No order for costs
  • Denbee and Anor v United Group Rail (NZ) Ltd (formerly Alstom Transport New Zealand Ltd)

    D Asher [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]

    Summary:
    DISPUTE - First applicant sought finding that she was covered by terms of relevant collective employment agreement – Alleged respondent’s refusal to apply CEA breached s56 and s62(2) Employment…
    Result:
    Question answered in favour of applicant ; Orders accordingly ; Costs reserved