-
McMillan v Attorney-General in respect of the Chief of Defence Force of the New Zealand Defence Force
G J Wood [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- UNFAIR BARGAINING - Fixed term agreement - Alleged induced into entering into agreement by misrepresentations and lack of good faith - Respondent accepted bargaining unfair - No binding guarantees of…
- Result:
- Application granted ; Compensation ($2,000) Costs reserved
-
12 September 2003
-
WA 129/03
-
Smith v Taieri Wastebusters Trust Inc
P Cheyne [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- BREACH OF CONTRACT - Alleged respondent reduced hours of work and prevented use of respondent's vehicle for travel to and from work in breach of employment agreement - Discussions over…
- Result:
- Application granted in part ; Arrears of wages and holiday pay (Quantum reserved) ; Interest (7 percent) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($70)(Lodgement fee)
-
12 September 2003
-
CA 97/03
-
Firmin v Resene Paints Ltd
G J Wood [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- CONSENT ORDER - Parties reached agreement on terms of settlement at investigation meeting - Terms of settlement to be orders of Authority - Order prohibiting publication of terms of settlement…
- Result:
- Consent order granted ; No order for costs
-
11 September 2003
-
WA 128/03
-
Smith v C R Soanes Ltd
K Raureti [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Constructive dismissal - Scope of employment - Worked as driver but did not have correct driver's license - Moved to factory work - Respondent alleged move because…
- Result:
- Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($3,606.40 reduced to $2,163.84) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($1,800) ; Costs reserved
-
11 September 2003
-
AA 279/03
-
Whiston v Waiariki Institute of Technology
K Raureti [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- COSTS - Successful personal grievance - One day investigation meeting - Sought contribution of $6,000 to total costs of $10,000 plus disbursements - Costs to follow event - Representatives progressed…
- Result:
- Costs in favour of applicant ($2,000)
-
11 September 2003
-
AA 221A/03
-
Graham v Airways Corporation of New Zealand Ltd
A Dumbleton [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Poor performance - Alleged failure to adequately complete training - Alleged critical mistake during training - Whether dismissal available for failure - Alleged training examination too long…
- Result:
- Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
-
Tai v Robinson t/a Coronation Lodge Rest Home
D Asher [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- COSTS - Unsuccessful personal grievance - One day investigation meeting - De novo challenge filed in Employment Court - Appropriate to determine costs in Authority - Sought contribution to total…
- Result:
- Costs in favour of respondent ($1,500)
-
09 September 2003
-
WA 94A/03
-
Smith and Ors v Vice Chancellor of the University of Canterbury
H Doyle [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- DISPUTE - Whether free car parking term or condition of employment - Respondent sought to charge fee for previously free parking for employees - Whether removal of free parking reduced…
- Result:
- Application dismissed ; Question answered in favour of respondent ; Costs reserved
-
09 September 2003
-
CA 96/03
-
Stewart v The Commissioner of Police
R A Monaghan [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Application for removal of proceedings to Employment Court - Alleged important questions of law - Whether prosecution of disciplinary charges under Police Act 1958 amounted to…
- Result:
- Application granted in part ; No order for costs
-
09 September 2003
-
AA 278/03
-
Niblett v Renwick t/a Good Times Juice Company and Anor
H Doyle [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Identity of employer - No written employment agreement - Interviewed by first respondent - Told that first respondent to become shareholder of company - Introduced to…
- Result:
- Question answered in favour of respondents ; No order for costs
-
08 September 2003
-
CA 95/03