-
Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board
A Fitzgibbon [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- RAISING PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – Whether grievance raised within 90 days – Cardiac Physiologist
- Result:
- Applications dismissed (unjustified disadvantage) ; Costs reserved
-
Crush v Southern District Health Board
D Appleton [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- COSTS – Partially successful personal grievance claim – Five day investigation meeting – Applicant sought indemnity costs – Respondent sought $10,696 indemnity costs – Applicant made Calderbank offer for $3,000…
- Result:
- Costs in favour of applicant ($16,100 plus GST) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($2,460.42)(accommodation, travel and hearing costs)
-
de Carteret v E-Comm Group Ltd
V Campbell [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – ARREARS OF WAGES AND HOLIDAY PAY – Applicant sought arrears of wages and holiday pay – COSTS –…
- Result:
- Applications granted ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($8,000) ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($4,0438.45) ; Arrears of wages and holiday pay ($3,634.61) ; Costs in favour of applicant ($250) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)
-
Rodionov v Ozone Technologies Ltd
M Loftus [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – Constructive dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by respondent misappropriating his personal property and failing to conduct…
- Result:
- Applications dismissed ; Costs reserved
-
Labour Inspector v JES Construction Ltd
A Fitzgibbon [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- COMPLIANCE ORDER – Applicant sought compliance with notice requiring production of wage and time and holiday and leave records – PENALTY – Applicant sought penalty for respondent’s failure to…
- Result:
- Applications granted ; Compliance ordered ; Penalty ($6,000)(payable to Crown) ; Costs in favour of applicant ($500) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee)
-
Wannenburg v Theta Systems Ltd
A Fitzgibbon [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Information Technology Senior Consultant
- Result:
- Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($23,133.36) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($20,000) ; Costs reserved
-
Mann v Maxam Corporation Ltd
T MacKinnon [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Whether valid 90 day trial period - Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by respondent’s actions - Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent
- Result:
- Application granted (unjustified disadvantage) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($1,500) ; Application dismissed (unjustified dismissal) ; Costs reserved
-
Kumar v Punjabi Dhaba Ltd
D Appleton [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- COSTS – Successful wage arrears and holiday pay claim – Half day investigation meeting –Applicant sought $5,350 contribution towards costs – Authority found appropriate to award costs where applicant recovered…
- Result:
- Costs in favour of applicant ($2,250) ; Disbursements ($71.56)(lodgement fee)($65.20)(costs of common bundle)
-
Guise v Spotless Facility Services (New Zealand) Ltd
M Loftus [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL– Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by being suspended prior to dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – ARREARS OF WAGES –…
- Result:
- Applications dismissed (unjustified dismissal)(unjustified disadvantage)(arrears of wages) ; Costs reserved
-
Wright v Mainland Driving School Ltd
C Hickey [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- CONSENT ORDER – Parties reached agreement on terms of settlement at investigation meeting – Terms of settlement to be orders of Authority – Order prohibiting publication of terms of settlement
- Result:
- Consent order granted ; Orders accordingly ; No order for costs