Search results

Results 7841-7850 of 21097

  • Kim (Labour Inspector) v Pro-Build Canterbury Ltd

    Christine Hickey [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]

    Summary:
    JURISDICTION – Whether employees or independent contractors – ARREARS OF HOLIDAY PAY – Applicant sought arrears of holiday pay – PENALTY – Applicant sought penalties for respondent’s failure to pay…
    Result:
    Applications granted ; Arrears of holiday pay ($41,858.09) ; Interest (5%) ; Penalty ($15,000)(payable to Crown) ; Costs in favour of applicant ($1,000) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($145.36)(filing fee and witness expenses)

  • Catapang v Aylwin and Anor

    Robin Arthur [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Identity of employer - Whether applicant employed by first respondent or second respondent - First respondent director of second respondent - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Dismissal -…
    Result:
    Applications granted (practice and procedure)(unjustified dismissal) ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($4,000) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($5,000) ; Application dismissed (penalty) ; Costs in favour of applicant ($1,500) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee)

  • Prins v JAE Sales Ltd

    R Larmer [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    PENALTY – Applicant sought penalties for respondent’s failure to provide written employment agreement (EA), failure to keep accurate leave and holiday records and failure to provide records on request –…
    Result:
    Application dismissed ; Costs to lie where they fall

  • Sahib v New Zealand Post Ltd

    A Fitzgibbon [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    RAISING PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – Whether grievance raised within 90 days – Applicant sought leave to raise grievance out of time – Customer Services Representative
    Result:
    Application dismissed ; Costs reserved

  • Cliff v The Bay of Plenty District Health Board

    TG Tetitaha [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    COSTS - Successful personal grievance claim - One and a half days investigation meeting - Applicant sought $7,000 contribution towards costs - Authority found reduction to notional daily tariff inappropriate…
    Result:
    Costs in favour of applicant ($5,250)

  • Clark v Goodman Fielder New Zealand Ltd

    TG Tetitaha [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]

    Summary:
    UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious Misconduct – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Supermarket merchandisers
    Result:
    Application granted ; Contributory conduct (50%) ; Reimbursement of lost wages (quantum to be determined) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($2,500) ; Costs reserved

  • Hixon (Labour Inspector) v NCHR Ltd

    J Crichton [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]

    Summary:
    COMPLIANCE ORDER – Applicant sought compliance with statutory requirement to comply with improvement notice – PENALTY – Applicant sought penalty for respondent’s failure to comply with improvement notice
    Result:
    Applications granted ; Orders made ; Penalty ($2,500)(payable to Crown) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee) ; No order for costs

  • Leary v Ferguson Civil Industries Ltd (in receivership)

    D Appleton [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]

    Summary:
    JURISDICTION – Whether applicant employee or independent contractor – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious misconduct - Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – ARREARS OF WAGES – Applicant sought arrears of…
    Result:
    Applications granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($8,965.68) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($1,000) ; Arrears of wages ($1,400) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee) ; Costs reserved

  • Gibbs v The Vice-Chancellor of Lincoln University

    H Doyle [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]

    Summary:
    UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Redundancy – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – University lecturer
    Result:
    Application granted ; Orders made ; Reinstatement ; Reimbursement of lost wages, quantum to be determined ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($10,000) ; Costs reserved

  • Carter v The Rent Centre Ltd

    M Ryan [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]

    Summary:
    CONSENT ORDER - Parties reached agreement on terms of settlement during investigation meeting - Terms of settlement to be orders of Authority - Order prohibiting publication of terms of settlement
    Result:
    Consent order granted ; Orders accordingly ; No order for costs