-
White v Telecom New Zealand Ltd
H Doyle [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- COSTS - Partially successful claims - Two day investigation meeting - Applicant sought $12,000 contribution towards costs - Matter heard at same time as another applicant - Applicant made $34,000…
- Result:
- Costs in favour of applicant ($3,900); Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee) ($17.25)(courier)
-
Allot v Telecom New Zealand Ltd
H Doyle [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- COSTS - Successful personal grievance - Two day investigation meeting - Applicant sought $10,508 indemnity costs - Matter heard at same time as another applicant - Both parties made calderbank…
- Result:
- Costs in favour of applicant ($4,400); Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee) ($17.25)(courier)
-
Shaw v Southern District Health Board
M B Loftus [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- JURISDICTION - Whether settlement agreement between parties prevented Authority hearing matter - Accord and satisfaction - Applicant claimed entered agreement under duress by representation - Respondent sought strikeout of application
-
Bradcock v Wilhelmsen Ships Service Ltd
A Fitzgibbon [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- COMPLIANCE ORDER - Applicant sought compliance with parties' settlement agreement (SA") - Whether respondent failed to make best endeavours to retrieve e-mails in respondent's possession between applicant and applicant's late…
- Result:
- Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
-
Millar v Whangaroa Health Services Trust
T G Tetitaha [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by being placed on garden leave after resignation - Applicant locked out of IT system - Whether applicant exhibited hostile attitude towards respondent…
- Result:
- Application partially granted ; No order for costs
-
Hughes v Board of Trustees of Rotorua Girls High School
G J Wood [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Redundancy - Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by redundancy process and unjustifiably dismissed by respondent - Applicant made redundant from head of department but …
- Result:
- Applications granted (unjustified disadvantage)(recovery of monies); Compensation for humiliation etc ($7,500); Compensation for loss of benefit ($14,000)(management units); Recovery of monies ($600)(conference)($2,280)(retraining); Application dismissed (unjustified dismissal); Costs reserved
-
Kerr v Air Nelson
D Appleton [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- RAISING PERSONAL GRIEVANCE - Whether applicant raised grievance within 90 days - Two unjustified disadvantage claims relating to heated discussion with manager and final warning - Respondent allegedly berated and…
- Result:
- Application partially granted; Costs reserved
-
Bishop v Scott and Anor
T G Tetitaha [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- CONSENT ORDER - Parties reached agreement on terms of settlement at investigation meeting - Applicant admitted was not employee of either respondent - Parties agreed costs to lie where they…
- Result:
- Consent order granted ; Orders accordingly ; Costs to lie where they fall
-
Gladden v Able Owl XL Ltd
A Fitzgibbon [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- ARREARS OF WAGES AND HOLIDAY PAY - Applicant sought arrears of wages and holiday pay - Commission payments - Whether applicant went through proper sales verification process - Whether applicant…
- Result:
- Applications granted (arrears of wages and holiday pay)(unjustified disadvantage) ; Arrears of wages ($4,694) ; Interest (5%) ; Arrears of holiday pay ($376.32) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($2,000) ; Application dismissed (penalty - good faith) ; Costs reserved
-
Harada and Anor v Caon and Ors
C Hickey [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Second applicant objected to second respondent's improvement notice requiring second applicant to pay arrears of holiday pay to first applicant - Whether first applicant overpaid by…
- Result:
- Application dismissed ; Disbursements in favour of second respondent ($71.56)(filing fee) ; No order for costs