Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No AA 215/06
Hearing date 30 May 2006
Determination date 23 June 2006
Member V Campbell
Representation D Jacobson ; B Nabney
Location Auckland
Parties Watson v New Zealand Electrical Traders Ltd t/a Bray Switchgear
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Redundancy - Whether redundancy genuine - No written employment agreement - Significant dispute over facts - Respondent's business cyclical - Applicant offered job at competing firm but declined offer - Applicant advised employment would be terminated as result of down-turn - Manager then retracted redundancy - Days later applicant advised employment would be that day - Applicant not told why chosen or given explanation of criteria used in judging who made redundant - No opportunity to discuss alternatives - Authority found it difficult to accept manager's evidence of down-turn severity - Evidence failed to establish applicant dismissed because of genuine restructuring or redundancy - Manager no longer wanted applicant working for him and saw redundancy as way to achieve that - Redundancy not genuine - Process inadequate - Unjustified dismissal - Remedies - Situation exacerbated by fact applicant declined good employment offer not knowing would be made redundant soon after - Although distressed applicant obtained alternative employment quickly - No contributory conduct - Lost benefit claim was contingent on finding genuine redundancy - Length of service one year five months - Electrician
Result Application granted ; Reimbursement for lost wages (1 week, 1 day) ($845.76) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($5,000) ; No order for costs
Cases Cited GN Hale & Son Ltd v Wellington Caretakers IUOW [1991] 1 NZLR 151;Nelson Aero Club Inv v Palmer unreported, Shaw J, 7 March 2000, WC 10A/00;Staykov v Cap Gemini Ernst & Young NZ Ltd unreported, Travis J, 20 April 2005, AC 18/05
Number of Pages 10
PDF File Link: aa 215_06.pdf [pdf 44 KB]