-
New Zealand Amalgamated Engineering, Printing and Manufacturing union Inc v Silver Fern Farms Ltd
M B Loftus [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- DISPUTE – Interpretation of parties’ collective employment agreement (“CEA”) – Parties disputed whether employees should receive additional payment under CEA dirty work clause when employees worked with respondent soot blowing…
- Result:
- Question answered in favour of respondent ; Costs reserved
-
Asnet Technologies Ltd v Meyer
R Arthur [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- CONSENT ORDER - Parties reached agreement on terms of settlement at investigation meeting - Terms of settlement to be orders of Authority - Order prohibiting publication of terms of settlement
- Result:
- Consent order granted; No orders for costs
-
New Zealand Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v Affco New Zealand
M Ryan [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- BARGAINING – Application for reference to facilitation – Applicant sought reference to facilitation under s50C(1)(c) Employment Relations Act 2000 – Applicant claimed had been protracted or acrimonious strikes and lockouts…
- Result:
- Application granted ; No order for costs
-
Wilson & Anor v Pow & Anor
P Cheyne [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- ARREARS OF WAGES - Applicants sought arrears of wages and holiday pay - Authority found respondent not entitled to deduct from first applicant's (R") wages cost of repairing alleged damage…
- Result:
- Applications granted ; Arrears of wages ($1,446.30)(first applicant) ; Arrears of wages and holiday pay ($2,624.71)(second applicant) ; Interest payable (5%) ; Costs reserved
-
NZ Amalgamated Engineering, Printing & Manufacturing Union Inc v Holcim (New Zealand) Ltd
H Doyle [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for removal to Employment Court (“EC”) – Parties sought order for removal on grounds important question of law likely to arise and in all circumstances…
- Result:
- Application granted ; Costs reserved
-
Booth v Hirequip Ltd
P Cheyne [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- COSTS - Successful personal grievance - One day investigation meeting - Applicant sought $14,000 contribution to costs as Calderbank offer rejected by respondent - Respondent argued timeframe given to respond…
- Result:
- Costs in favour of applicant ($4,000) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(Filing fee)
-
Te Anini v Mills Road Freight Ltd t/a Freight Plus Ltd
E Robinson [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- CONSENT ORDER - Parties reached agreement on applicant's arrears of holiday pay - Respondent to pay applicant $4,512 arrears of holiday pay - Interest payable - Terms of settlement to…
- Result:
- Consent order granted ; Orders accordingly ; Interest (5%) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(Filing fee) ; Costs reserved
-
Rix-Trott v The Freight People Ltd
J Crichton [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- COSTS - Partially successful claim - Investigation meeting less than half day - Applicant sought $2,000 contribution towards costs - Respondent claimed costs should lie where they fall - Authority…
- Result:
- Costs to lie where they fall
-
Prasad & Ors v Supreme Builders & Developers (NZ) Ltd
R A Monaghan [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- ARREARS OF WAGES AND HOLIDAY PAY - First applicant (P") and second applicant ("N") sought arrears of wages and holiday pay - Third applicant ("K") sought arrears of wages -…
- Result:
- Applications granted; Arrears of wages ($5,505.50)(first applicant); Arrears of wages ($8,076.25)(second applicant); Arrears of wages ($5,504.50)(third applicant); Arrears of holiday pay ($1,200)(first applicant); Arrears of holiday pay ($1,400)(second applicant); Interest (5%); No order for costs; Disbursements in favour of first and second applicants ($71.56)(filing fee); Disbursements in favour of third applicant ($71.56)(filing fee)
-
Horne v Te Awamutu Residential Trust
J Crichton [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Redundancy – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Authority found decision to make applicant’s position redundant not genuine – Found respondent did not…
- Result:
- Applications granted; $25,000 reimbursement of lost wages; $8,000 compensation for humiliation etc; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(Filing fee); Costs reserved