-
Pelabon v Zumo Retail Nelson Ltd
Michele Ryan [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- JURISDICTION – Whether valid 90 day trial period – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – ARREARS OF WAGES AND HOLIDAY PAY – Applicant…
- Result:
- Applications granted (unjustified dismissal)(arrears of wages and holiday pay) ; Reimbursement of lost wages and holiday pay ($5,470.85) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($5,000) ; Arrears of wages and holiday pay ($353.22) ; Application dismissed (penalty) ; Costs reserved
-
Stewart v Lee-Jones & Anor
M Loftus [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent - Whether applicant casual, fixed or permanent employee - Farmworker
- Result:
- Applicant granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($7,705) ; Costs reserved
-
Gillette v Sunpower Ltd & Anor
A Dallas [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- COMPLIANCE ORDER – Applicant sought compliance with previous Authority determination – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Applicant sought leave to recover monies owing from director of respondent
- Result:
- Application granted (compliance order) ; Compliance ordered ; Application reserved (practice and procedure) ; Costs reserved
-
Olsen v Peninsula Health (2010) Ltd
Helen Doyle [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – UNJUSTIFIED DIMISSAL – Constructive Dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by respondent unilaterally changing hours of work detailed in employment agreement (“EA”) – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed…
- Result:
- Applications granted (unjustified disadvantage)(unjustified dismissal) ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($9,620) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($15,000) ; Application dismissed (penalty) ; Costs reserved
-
New Zealand Steel Ltd v E Tu Inc.
V Campbell [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- DISPUTE – Parties disputed review of manning levels required at steel plant – Applicant sought review and reduction of manning levels per shift – Respondent withheld consent to reduce…
- Result:
- Question answered in favour of respondent ; Costs reserved
-
Walker v New Zealand Compliance and Repairs Ltd
E Robinson [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Whether grievance raised within 90 days – Mechanic
- Result:
- Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
-
Hall v Stephanie Morelli t/a Love & Mr Lewis
A Fitzgibbon [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Casual Florist
- Result:
- Application dismissed ; No order for costs
-
Prakash v Wendco (NZ) Ltd
A Fitzgibbon [Employment Relations Authority - Auckland]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious Misconduct – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Shift Supervisor
- Result:
- Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
-
Thomson v CWB Ltd
M Loftus [Employment Relations Authority - Wellington]
- Summary:
- CONSENT ORDER – Parties reached agreement on terms of settlement at investigation meeting – Terms of settlement to be orders of Authority – Order prohibiting publication of terms of settlement
- Result:
- Consent order granted ; Orders accordingly ; No order for costs
-
Crowther v Mediaworks Radio Ltd
C Hickey [Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch]
- Summary:
- UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Redundancy – Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by respondent’s actions – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – ARREARS OF WAGES – Applicant sought arrears…
- Result:
- Applications dismissed; Costs reserved